State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Western Carolina Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The reason, usually given for the creation of quasi-judicial bodies is the -assertion that they can expeditiously and economically resolve factual questions necessary for the proper disposition of .special .problems committed to them for decision.
The Utilities Commission is given general supervision over rates charged and services rendered by telephone companies. G.S. 62-30. It is the duty of the Commission on its own motion or upon c-omplaint -by a patron or upon petition of a ¡public utility to1 bold a hearing to determine “the just, reasonable .and sufficient ¡rates” which the utility may…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolinas Committee for Industrial Power Rates & Area Development, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Skipper v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Hill v. FEDERAL LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COM'NArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COM'N v. JD McCotter, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COM'NArizona Supreme Court · 1965