Legal Opinion
Hale v. Burkhardt
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1988No. 18426PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant, Preston Q. Hale, a real estate broker, entered into an oral agreement with respondents, Joe E. Burkhardt and Joe E. Burkhardt and Associates (hereinafter “Burkhardt”), in which Hale was to assist Burkhardt in purchasing real property comprising an entire city block in Reno, Nevada, for a development project to be known as Liberty Center. Hale claims that as a result of his efforts, Burkhardt was able to purchase the property for his project. Burkhardt refused to pay Hale, and Hale sued for broker’s commissions and fees claimed to be due to him. Hale’s fourth cause of action…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Laterza v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Edgar v. WagnerNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Inc. v. Tracy Collins Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by21 opinions
- Brown v. Kinross Gold, U.S.A.District Court, D. Nevada · 2005
- Pemberton v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- Siragusa v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Bemis v. Estate of BemisNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Allum v. Valley Bank of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.