Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Stall v. City of Knoxville
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The City of Knoxville, acting through its governing body, enacted Ordinances No. 3049, 3050, 3052 and 3053 which annexed to the City the property therein described. These ordinances were passed under the provisions and *274in accordance with. Chapter 113 of the Public Acts of 1955, appearing now as Sections 6-309 et seq. T.C.A.
On December 8,1960 the complainants, Dr. B. G. Stall, et al, commenced an action in the First Circuit Court for Knox County in the nature of a quo warranto proceeding contesting the validity of all of said Ordinances. The Trial Court upheld the validity thereof and from his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morton v. Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Witt v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. BomerTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Knoxville v. State ex rel. GravesTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- State ex rel. Hardison v. City of ColumbiaTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville and George F. McCanless Attorney General of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Dupuis v. HandTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CoolidgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- State ex rel. Stall v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- State ex rel. Hudson v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.