Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Hudson v. City of Chattanooga
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHATTIN, Justice.
This appeal is from an adverse decree of the Chancellor upholding the validity of three ordinances enacted for the purpose of annexing certain areas of Hamilton County to the City of Chattanooga.
The suit was filed by Lucius P. Hudson and other residents and citizens of the affected areas under the authority of T.C.A. Section 6-310 seeking to have the annexation proceedings declared unreasonable and unnecessary for the welfare of the residents and property owners of the affected areas as well as the residents and property owners of the City of Chattanooga.
Relators,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Deane Hill Country Club, Inc. v. City of Knoxville and George F. McCanless Attorney General of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Balsinger v. Town of MadisonvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Williams v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Chattanooga v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
- Morton v. Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Kingsport v. State Ex Rel. Crown Enterprises, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Watauga v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- James P. Little M.D. v. City of Chattanooga, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
- Rhea County v. Town of GraysvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002