Sogn v. Koetzle
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha 'County. Hon. Joseph W. JONES, Judge. Action by Mary So-gn, against John, Koetzle and another, 'co-partners as Koetzle & Sdiopf, and the Western Surety Company, to -recover damages, upon a surety 'bond, for unlawful selling of intoxicating liquors-. From an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendants appeal (i) To ipoint -one rof ¡tibe opinion, Appellants cited: State Chicago, Milwaukee & St. HaJul R. R. Co-., 4 S. D. 261;…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha 'County. Hon. Joseph W. JONES, Judge. Action by Mary So-gn, against John, Koetzle and another, 'co-partners as Koetzle & Sdiopf, and the Western Surety Company, to -recover damages, upon a surety 'bond, for unlawful selling of intoxicating liquors-. From an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, defendants appeal (i) To ipoint -one rof ¡tibe opinion, Appellants cited: State Chicago, Milwaukee & St. HaJul R. R. Co-., 4 S. D. 261; Texas M'ut. Life Ins. -Co. v. Davidge, 51 Tex. 244; Rust-O-wen Lbr. Co. v. AMellman, 10 S-. D. 122. Respondent -cited:…
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appeal from an -order overruling demurrer to complaint. Action against Roetzle & S-ohopf, copartners and retail dealers in intoxicating liquors in the city of Sioux Falls, and Western Surety Company, -bondsman, for damages resulting from unlawful sales of intoxicating liquors to- plaintiff’s 'husband. The -complaint is attacked on two grounds only: First, that it fails to show the defendant Western Surety Company to- be a legal entity. Second, that -the complaint fails to- show “conditions precedent to such bio-nd becoming- a valid obligation.”
[1] Appellant cites State v. C., M. & St. P. Ry.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hurst v. SelvidgeTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
- Texas Mutual Life Insurance v. DavidgeTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- C. Aultman & Co. v. SiglingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Garrigan v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Palmer v. SchurzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Springer v. SwiftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Smith v. MiersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Boswell v. BetheaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Walkin v. NokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- O'Connor v. HemeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.