Legal Opinion

Springer v. Swift

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1931No. File No. 7125PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbeee, J.

Plaintiff instituted her action against the defendant to recover actual and exemplary damages for slander. The complaint undertook to set forth two causes of action. The first cause of action charged that the defendant wrongful^, fraudulenty, and maliciously published to Mrs. Charles L. Swift, his wife, a certain false, untrue, and slanderous statement concerning the plaintiff imputing to the plaintiff thereby the present existence of an infectious, contagious, and loathsome disease. As to the first cause of action, there is no allegation that the statement was made in the presence or hearing…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Oakes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Myers v. LongstaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Stianson v. StiansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Pierson v. Minnehaha CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scotvold v. ScotvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Dworkin v. L.F.P., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Central Arizona Light & Power Co. v. AkersArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Brodsky v. Journal Publishing Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Furr v. FoulkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API