Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Schurz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1908PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Circuit .Court Davison'County: • Hon.-Frank-B. Smith, Judge..- • ■ ■ , . ...... Action- by Carrie E. Palmer aga,in;st Conrad ‘Schurz and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff as widow of Henry C. Palmer, deceased, on a bond executed by the defendant Conrad Schurz, as principal, and the Western Surety Company, as surety, to recover on ¡behalf of herself and minor children damages 'for the loss of support caused by the ,death of her said husband. The action was 'tried to a jury, and verdict and judgment being in favor of the plaintiff, the defendants have appealed.

It is alleged in the complaint, in substance, that the plaintiff is the widow of said Plenry C. Palmer, deceased; that she and her sai|d husband, Henry C. Palmer, were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Oberlander v. Fixen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Edwards v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. People v. SehornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Longley v. DalySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Dimick v. DownsIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meinecke v. Intermountain Transportation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. CondonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. WadeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Island v. HelmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Farmers State Bank v. JeskeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API