Legal Opinion
Bronken v. Morton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 3, 1973No. Nos. 25282-25284PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOELSCH, Circuit Judge:
These three cases are here on the plaintiffs’ appeals from summary judgments dismissing their actions to review administrative decisions of the Secretary of the Interior refusing to issue patents to public lands pursuant to applications filed by plaintiffs as holders of land selection rights.1
From time to time, especially during the Nineteenth Century, Congress has seen fit to bestow upon persons performing services for the government, or upon other persons deemed worthy, rights to receive lands from the public domain. To that end, provisions have been made for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Robert v. Ferry v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Autrice Copeland Freeman v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- McLaren v. FleischerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Webster v. LutherSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ray Strickland and Sam Lorimer v. Hon. Rogers C. B. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Kenneth M. Kale v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- County of Trinity v. AndrusDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1977
- Arizona Power Authority v. MortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- State of Utah, by and Through Its Division of State Lands v. Thomas S. Kleppe, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.