Legal Opinion
Ray Strickland and Sam Lorimer v. Hon. Rogers C. B. Morton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1975No. 74-1618PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge:
Appellants seek to reverse a decision of the Secretary of the Interior denying their separate applications for homestead entry. Under procedures specified in the Classification and Multiple Use Act of 1964, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1411-18, Federal public lands are to be classified by the Secretary of the Interior either as being “suitable for disposal,” or alternatively, as being of such value “as to make them more suitable for retention in Federal ownership” and managed for public purposes. A classification decision that lands are not suitable for disposal has the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Work v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Panama Canal Co. v. Grace Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ness Investment Corporation, and Canyon Lake Resort, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, and Fred Wirth, ForestsupervisorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sierra Club v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Fund for Animals, Inc. v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- City of Santa Clara v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.