Legal Opinion

Flora v. Russell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1894No. 16,742PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The appellees had caused a search warrant to be issued, under authority of which the home of appellant was entered and searched' for a butt of tobacco, claimed by appellees to have been stolen by appellant from a car of the .appellee, the Ohio and Mississippi Railway Company. No such tobacco was found in or about the residence of appellant.

This action was then instituted by the appellant. The complaint was in three paragraphs, the first counting upon malicious prosecution; the second, upon libel; and the third, upon trespass. A demurrer was overruled to the first paragraph of the complaint,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dickson v. WaldronIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Palmeri v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Chicago & Eastern Railroad v. FlexmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Oliver v. PateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HenbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Harper v. GoodinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Hutchinson v. WenzelIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Barrow v. Weddle Brothers ConstructionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API