Hutchinson v. Wenzel
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom the Gibson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.
— Appellee sued the appellant for malicious prosecution. Verdict and judgment for appellee for $5,000. The overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial is the only error assigned.
The first reason set out in the motion, and the one most earnestly urged upon the consideration of this court, is that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence.
The material facts which the evidence tends to establish follow: At the time of his arrest, the appellee, Wenzel, had resided in the city of Evansville for four years, about two miles distant from appellant, Hutchinson, and had lived…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Barron v. MasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Graeter v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Bitting v. Ten EyckIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Lytton v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HenbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Yerkes v. Washington Manufacturing Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Smith v. GravesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Dwyer v. McCleanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.