Legal Opinion
Rancocas Valley Regional High School Board of Education v. M.R.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 9, 2005No. Civil Action 04-1136 (SSB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING NEW JERSEY’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6)
BROTMAN, District Judge.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This matter, essentially a monetary dispute, comes before the Court to review the decision of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). ALJ Douglas H. Hurd decided that Rancocas Valley Board of Education (“Rancocas Valley”) had not provided A.R. with a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”). In his final decision dated January 16, 2004 ALJ Hurd ordered Rancocas Valley to pay for A.R.’s placement in a twelve-month program at Devereaux. (Br. at 3). The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Ala, Inc. v. Ccair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Traverse Bay Area Intermediate School District v. Michigan Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- New Jersey Protection & Advocacy, Inc. v. New Jersey Department of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008