Legal Opinion

Hanover National Bank of New York v. Suddath

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 29, 1909No. 12PublishedCited by 20 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion. Plaintiff in error had the right to retain the notes under the express terms of the collateral agreement. Auten v.. Bank, 174 U. S, 125, 145; Hiscock v. Varick Bank, 206 U. S. 28, and cases cited. As to scope of words “or otherwise” see Farr v. Nichols, 132 N. Y. 327. As, bailee of the notes the Hanover Bank had a lien on them.' Benjamin on Sales, § 2, Am. note.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion. Plaintiff in error had the right to retain the notes under the express terms of the collateral agreement. Auten v.. Bank, 174 U. S, 125, 145; Hiscock v. Varick Bank, 206 U. S. 28, and cases cited. As to scope of words “or otherwise” see Farr v. Nichols, 132 N. Y. 327. As, bailee of the notes the Hanover Bank had a lien on them.' Benjamin on Sales, § 2, Am. note. As to construction of the agreement, see Gillét v. Bank, 160.N. Y. 549'; Battler v. Hallock, 160 N. Y. 291, 297; Church v. Hubbart, 2…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The predecessor of the present receiver of the American National. Bank of Abilene, Texas, sued, in April, 1905, to recover from the Hanover National Bank of New York four promissory notes or their value:

We.shall refer tovthe corporations as the Abilene Bank and the Hanover Bank.

At the trial, under instruction, there was verdict for the Hanover Bank, and the judgment thereon was reversed. Van Zandt v. Hanover Nat. Bank, 149 Fed. Rep. 127. In conformity to the opinion'of the Circuit Court of Appeals, on the new trial'a verdict was directed in favor of the receivér, and to reverse'the affirmance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Biebinger v. Continental BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Bank of Montreal v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Avant v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958
  2. BancoKentucky Co.'s Receiver v. National Bank of Kentucky's ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Scholtens v. ScholtensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. American National Bank v. Minor & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Harrison v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API