County of Trinity v. County of Mendocino
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tehama County. 3. P. Ellison, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
By the acts of 1851 and 1853 the fortieth parallel of north latitude was made the dividing line between the counties of Trinity, Humboldt, and Mendocino, and constituted the north line of Mendocino, and the south line of Trinity and Humboldt. The line was not well defined or marked on the ground, and the legislature, by the act of March 30, 1872 (Stats. 1871-2, p. 766), provided for a commission of survey to be chosen by the boards of supervisors of the counties concerned, and authorized such commission to appoint a surveyor, who was directed thereupon to “accurately run, thoroughly mark and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Crane v. ReederMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- People v. FredericksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ex Parte SohnckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In re FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- State Highway Commission v. RawsonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Matter of Petition of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- McNeil v. KingsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Board of County Commissioners v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.