Legal Opinion

Hatcher v. Clayton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 30, 1955No. 747PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

The evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, was sufficient in our opinion to warrant submission thereof to the jury on the issue as to the alleged negligence of Clayton. Admittedly, Pass owned the truck operated by Clayton. Such admission was sufficient to require submission of the issue of agency to the jury. G.S. 20-71.1; Davis v. Lawrence, post, 496, and cases cited. Assignments of error directed to the denial of appellant’s motions for judgment of nonsuit are overruled. Indeed, they are deemed abandoned ; for no reason or argument is stated and no authority is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. PoolosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Whiteside v. McCarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Baker v. MALAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Dinkins v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. White v. LaceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API