Legal Opinion

Spalding v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 28, 1912No. 939Published

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstracts 28479, 28480 (T. D. 32507), and Abstract 29095 (T. D. 32681).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal concerns certain finished leathers. They were made from the upper or hair side of split cowhide. They have the natural grain of the hide upon the surface, and in addition are embellished with an artificial grain, the importations and varieties differing in the design of the artificial grain alone. For all material purposes they are alike. They were in part assessed for duty by the collector at 15 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 451 of the tariff act of 1909, as “leathers not specially provided for,” and in the remaining part as “leathers not specially provided for” at the rate…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woolworth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. WhiteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Tilge v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Worsdell & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API