Legal Opinion

Tilge v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1911No. 577PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7134 (T. D. 31131).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal involves the dutiable classification of skivers. The name designates the grain side of a sheepskin split in the pickled state, and subsequently tanned, dressed, and finished. While this portion of the sheepskin is designated as a “skiver,” which is generally used in the making of sweatbands for hats, pocketbooks, the linings of valises, and similar uses, the iimer half, when similarly tanned, dressed, and finished, is designated as a “flesher,” and is principally, if not exclusively, used in the making of chamois. Asheep-skin not split, but tanned, dressed, and finished, is known…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. United States v. KlumppSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Worsdell & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Henry Clay & Bock & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. H. L. Gwalter & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. M. H. Pulaski Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API