C. R. v. Blue Shield of California
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA C. R., Case No. 25-cv-09226-AGT Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA, Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendant. Plaintiff C.R.’s motion to proceed under a pseudonym, dkt. 22, is granted for the reasons identified below, subject to reconsideration as the case proceeds.1 “The normal presumption in litigation is that parties must use their real names.” Doe v. Kamehameha Schs./Bernice Pauahi Bishop Est.,
596 F.3d 1036, 1042
(9th Cir. 2010). Parties may proceed pseudonymously only “in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Doe v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016