Legal Opinion
Pagliolo v. Guidant Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 4, 2007No. Civil 06-943 (DWF/SRN)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This age-discrimination action is before the Court pursuant to cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs’ Partial Motion for Summary Judgment and denies Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
BACKGROUND
In 2004, at least six of the corporations that then comprised “Guidant” simultaneously conducted a reduction in force (“RIF”). 1 At that time, Guidant Corporation (“Guidant Corporate”) was the parent company of several businesses, including United…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Recchia v. Kellogg Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Ribble v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Sowe v. Pall Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019