Legal Opinion

Ribble v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORP.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 15, 2010No. Case 09-C-643PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this action alleging age discrimination in connection with several reductions-in-force (“RIFs”) undertaken by Defendant Kimberly-Clark between 2005 and 2009. Plaintiffs have now filed a motion to compel meaningful responses to an interrogatory they served on Kimberly-Clark. The interrogatory in question reads as follows:

Identify by date each group layoff during the class period conducted by KC as part of the Global Business Plan that is not one of the seven phased layoffs described in the Complaint. For each layoff thus described,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raczak v. Ameritech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Carolyn Burlison v. McDonald's CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Pagliolo v. Guidant Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API