Legal Opinion
In Re Chan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 2003No. M-2-238PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER OF CENSURE
MCMAHON, District Judge.
On February 25, 2003, Christopher Chan, a member of the Bar of this Court, was ordered to show cause why he should not be disciplined by the Grievance Committee of this Court for violating DR 1-102(A)(5) and DR 7-104(A)(l). Chan, represented by Richard M. Maltz, Esq., filed his initial response with the Committee on March 17, 2003, and supplemented his response on April 10, 2003. For the reasons set forth below, the Committee unanimous-ly 1 concludes that Chan should be CENSURED.
Chan is a criminal defense lawyer. He represented Marzell…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Benjamin JamilCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Winston Massiah, Mitchell Anfield, Leonard Royal Aiken and Icky ThornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Grievance Committee for the Southern District of New York v. Robert M. SimelsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. KabirNew York Supreme Court · 2006