Legal Opinion

Throckmorton v. Burr

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, San Francisco County.

1Opinion of the CourtHeydenfeldt, J.

Murray, C. J., and Bryan, J., concurred.

From the character of the estate in common, tenants in common cannot join in an action for the. recovery of the estate. The interest *401of each is separate and distinct. The subject of the action in such case, would be the whole estate, and it cannot be said that either of the parties is interested in the whole estate, but only in an undivided moiety. This is all that either one can recover, and. consequently all that he should be allowed to sue for.

This subject was examined to some extent by this Court in the case of Johnson v. Sepulbeda, 5 Cal., 149, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Johnson v. SepulbedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Parke v. KilhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API