Legal Opinion

Parke v. Kilham

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appear from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of Amador. On re-hearing. Parke and Struck, the plaintiffs in the Court below, brought this action to recover from defendant the use of the waters of the middle fork of Jackson creek, and for damages, alleging a priority of right thereto. The answer of defendant denied plaintiffs’ priority, and claimed an exclusive right to the use of the waters of that stream.

Read the full summary

Appear from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of Amador. On re-hearing. Parke and Struck, the plaintiffs in the Court below, brought this action to recover from defendant the use of the waters of the middle fork of Jackson creek, and for damages, alleging a priority of right thereto. The answer of defendant denied plaintiffs’ priority, and claimed an exclusive right to the use of the waters of that stream. The testimony showed that plaintiffs’ grantors, about the first of December, 1852, located a mining-claim on the creek, at a place called Elliot’s Eanch, and in…

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This case was decided at the last April Term of this Court, and *79a re-argument had at the present time. We are satisfied, upon a more full argument and a more careful consideration of the case, that the judgment of the Court below should be reversed, and a new trial had. The learned counsel for the defendant insists that we did not correctly understand him, when we said, in a former opinion,.that “this position is based upon the idea, that the proper point could not be designated with certainty by a proper survey, but must be determined by the actual construction of the ditch.”

Taking the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De Johnson v. SepulbedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Throckmorton v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Heilbron v. FowLer Switch Canal Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Fabian v. CollinsMontana Supreme Court · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API