Legal Opinion

Loushin v. ITT Rayonier

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 25, 1996No. 18612-8-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

ITT Rayonier (ITT) appeals the reopening of James Loushin’s industrial insurance claim for back injuries. We are faced with two questions. First, can a chiropractor’s testimony be used to establish aggravation of an injury? Second, did sufficient evidence support the court’s findings that: (1) the aggravation of Loushin’s injury was causally related to his industrial injury; and (2) the aggravation required medical treatment? We hold that chiropractic testimony can establish aggravation and that sufficient evidence showed a causal relation between the injury and the aggravation, which did…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Goodman v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. First Covenant Church of Seattle v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eastwood v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Eastwood v. DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API