Loushin v. ITT Rayonier
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
ITT Rayonier (ITT) appeals the reopening of James Loushin’s industrial insurance claim for back injuries. We are faced with two questions. First, can a chiropractor’s testimony be used to establish aggravation of an injury? Second, did sufficient evidence support the court’s findings that: (1) the aggravation of Loushin’s injury was causally related to his industrial injury; and (2) the aggravation required medical treatment? We hold that chiropractic testimony can establish aggravation and that sufficient evidence showed a causal relation between the injury and the aggravation, which did…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Harris v. GrothWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Goodman v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- First Covenant Church of Seattle v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eastwood v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Eastwood v. DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009