Eastwood v. Department
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
219 P.3d 711 (2009)
Terri L. EASTWOOD, Respondent,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Defendant,
Rite Aid, Appellant.
No. 27297-4-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
August 18, 2009.
Steven Richard Reinisch, Jerald P. Keene, Reinisch MacKenzie P.C., Portland, OR, Erin Sullivan-Byorick, Reinisch MacKenzie P.C., Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Patrick K. Stiley, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
KULIK, A.C.J.
¶ 1 RCW 51.32.160(1)(a) provides that workers whose original workers' compensation claims have been closed may seek to reopen their claim for further benefits upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Nursery Products, Inc. v. Indian Wells OrchardsWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Wilber v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Phillips v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Moses v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Pont v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Zavala v. Twin City FoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Ronald v. Ma'ae, V State Of Wa Dept Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Robbins v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.