Legal Opinion

McKinnon v. McEwan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1882PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Bay. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

The plaintiff below, McKinnon, commenced an action of assumpsit, declaring upon the common counts. The defendant pleaded the general issue and gave notice of recoupment. The plaintiff’s claim was for a balance due under a written contract to furnish the materials and make for defendant two boilers, have the same “ completed and all connected in the mill of the said first party on or before the fifteenth day of March, 1880.” The'defendant, in his notice of recoupment, set forth that the boilers were to be used in his steam-mill and salt block for the purpose of running and operating the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Burrell v. New York & Saginaw Solar Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lowrie v. CastleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Machine Co. v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Doe v. Henry Ford Health SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Hooks Smelting Co. v. Planters' Compress Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. Hendricks v. DSW Shoe Warehouse Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API