Legal Opinion
Rohrer v. Eidal International
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 1968No. 195PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
The dispositive issue is “actual knowledge” of the occurrence which dispenses with written notice of accident and compensable injury under our Workmen’s Compensation Act. Section 59-10-13.4(B), N.M.S.A.1953. This issue is raised by both parties; plaintiff in appealing from a judgment in his favor, defendant by cross-appeal. Plaintiff complains of (1) the finding as to when the employee gave the employer “actual notice” and (2) the refusal of his requested finding as to when plaintiff knew he had suffered a compensable injury. Defendant complains of the trial court’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Lozano v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Hughes v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Winter v. Roberson Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Waymire v. Signal Oil Field Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Herman v. Miners' HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- Herndon v. Albuquerque Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Maes v. John C. Cornell, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Ortiz v. Ortiz & Torres Dri-Wall CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.