Legal Opinion

In re French

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided March 23, 1916PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Victor J. French, bankrupt. On petition to review an order of the referee. This is a proceeding on petition of the trustee in bankruptcy to reconsider and revise the order allowing the claim of Thomas A. Jewell. The trustee in bankruptcy Willard B. Phetteplace asks that the claim be disallowed on the ground that said Jewell has received a preference or preferences.

Read the full summary

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Victor J. French, bankrupt. On petition to review an order of the referee. This is a proceeding on petition of the trustee in bankruptcy to reconsider and revise the order allowing the claim of Thomas A. Jewell. The trustee in bankruptcy Willard B. Phetteplace asks that the claim be disallowed on the ground that said Jewell has received a preference or preferences. The validity of a chattel mortgage covering certain property is also in question as is the right of said Jewell to receive certain money from Borden’s Condensed Milk Factory in the city of Norwich…

1Opinion of the CourtRay, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The bankrupt, Victor J. French, was and is an unmarried man, but he rented and worked a farm in the town of Norwich, upon which was a dwelling house in which he lived and kept house, having a housekeeper, his aunt, who owned the larger part of the household furniture. However, the bankrupt purchased the supplies and boarded his hired help. He owned two Round Oak stoves and one cookstove, which were used in the house. This was a dairy farm, and the milk from the dairy was taken to Borden’s Condensary in the city of Norwich in the name of French. On the farm…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. In re SloanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Mulford v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Moran v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
  5. In re the Examination of WymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baumbaugh v. Los Angeles Morris Plan Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  2. Gylling v. KjergaardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  3. Patton v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Friedt v. MoseankoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hogan v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API