Legal Opinion

Baumbaugh v. Los Angeles Morris Plan Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 18, 1929No. 5596PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAN, District Judge.

This case involves the validity of a chattel mortgage given by the bankrupt, within four months pri- or to the adjudication, to the Los Angeles Morris Plan Company, to secure the payment of a past indebtedness due to the Plan Company. At the time of the execution of the mortgage, the bankrupt was, and for some time prior thereto had been, largely indebted to the Plan Company. This indebtedness was guaranteed by two comakers, and was payable in monthly installments. The bankrupt was in default for four or five payments, and the Plan Company had brought actions to recover…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. In re FrenchDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
  3. First Nat. Bank of Lake Charles v. LanzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
  4. Huntington v. BaskervilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re DudleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  2. IH KENT COMPANY v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1961
  3. I. H. Kent Company and First National Bank of Nevada v. Harry A. Busscher, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Boyce H. MillerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. McCannDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
  5. In re CarlDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API