Legal Opinion
Young v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 21, 2011No. Civil Action 11-412 (GK)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.
Pro se Plaintiff David Young brings this action against Defendants the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”), the United States Marshals Service (“U.S. Marshals”), and Assistant U.S. Attorney George May, alleging violations of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). 1
This matter is presently before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), 12(b)(2), 12(b)(3), and 12(b)(5)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cornish v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012