Legal Opinion

Brennan-Centrella v. RitzCraft Corp. of Pa.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 5, 2019No. 18-729-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

18-729-cv Brennan-Centrella v. RitzCraft Corp. of Pa. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marc J. Anderson & Jeffrey E. Grubb v. Dennis Branen, Ross Kindestin, Ed WisniefskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Marilyn GALDIERI-AMBROSINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Design Strategy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Patterson v. BalsamicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. CoplanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API