Legal Opinion
C.R.S. v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 19, 1991No. Civ. 4-90-299PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) or, in the alternative, for summary judgment under Rule 56(c). After a review of the file, record and proceedings, the court denies both motions.
FACTS
Plaintiffs D.B.S., C.R.S. and N.A.S. bring this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680, under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and under the Constitution of the United States. Because this matter is before the court as a result of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nash v. HendricksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Minns v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- C.R.S. Ex Rel. D.B.S. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993