Legal Opinion

Kohl v. Murphy

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 27, 1991No. 90 CV 6596PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of defendant Patrick T. Murphy (“Murphy”) to dis miss all four counts of plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted.

FACTS

This case is the epilogue to a lawsuit litigated in 1990 in the Juvenile Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County (Case No. 90 J 3751). In that case, plaintiffs Pamela and Joseph Kohl executed a consent form relinquishing all parental rights and obligations to their adopted son, Anthony. The Kohls had cared for Anthony and his younger brother, Sam, since August 2, 1982, when the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Illinois Constructors Corp. v. Morency & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  2. Worthem v. Gillette Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  3. Aero-Motive Co. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. Stemmons v. Toyota Tsusho America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. Gibson v. American Library Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API