Legal Opinion
Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS USA, LLC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 21, 2007No. 2:07-cv-126PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. # 19), Plaintiffs’ memoranda in opposition (Docs.# 34, 35), Defendant’s reply memorandum (Doc. # 36), and Plaintiffs’ sur-replies (Docs.# 61, 62). For the reasons that follow, the Court finds the motion to dismiss well taken.
I. Background
This is a class action case in which the putative class — retirees, their spouses, and surviving spouses or other dependents of individuals who worked for the named defendant company-assert that although they have a right…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Gentek Building Products, Inc., Steel Peel Litigation Trust, Formerly Known as Sherwin-Williams Claims Trust v. The Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Association of Cleveland Fire Fighters v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tackett v. M & G POLYMERS, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- M&G Polymers United States, LLC v. TackettSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Hobert Tackett v. M&G Polymers USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Hobert Tackett v. M&G Polymers USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009