Legal Opinion

Rinehart v. Rinehart

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 28, 1920PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On petition for divorce. On final hearing on pleadings and proofs ex parte.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

• On November 3d, 1917, a petition for divorce was filed on behalf of Joseph H. Binehart (44-193), the petitioner in this canse, and a citation was issued and returned by the sheriff “not found.” The petitioner entered the army and did not further prosecute that cause..

On June-16th, 1919, the petitioner, Joseph H. Binehart) commenced this suit for divorce by petition filed in this court (46-538). The defendant in this case was returned non-resident, and due notice of the order of this court directing the defendant to appear and answer the petitioner’s petition was duly…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burch v. BurchCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. Riehl v. RiehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Kirschbaum v. KirschbaumNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
  4. Herman v. HermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  5. McKee v. McKeeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API