Legal Opinion

Holt v. Sarver

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 18, 1970No. PB-69-C-24, 25, 29, 71, 75, 76, 80 and 91PublishedCited by 230 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

HENLEY, Chief Judge.

These eight class actions have been brought by inmates of the Cummins Farm Unit of the Arkansas State Penitentiary System and the Tucker Intermediate Reformatory which is a part of that System against the members of the Arkansas State Board of Corrections and the State Commissioner of Corrections who administer the system. Plaintiffs contend on behalf of themselves and on behalf of other inmates and on behalf of other persons who may in the future be confined at Cummins or at Tucker that the forced, uncompensated farm labor exacted from Arkansas convicts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Cooper v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Jackson v. BishopCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. John Alfred Lee v. Ralph H. Tahash, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by230 opinions

  1. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Sostre v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. Bowring v. GodwinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  5. Bobby Williams v. Larry BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API