Legal Opinion

Kracl v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1985No. 84-147PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

This case involves two general issues: (1) The legal liability of one motor vehicle operator to the other for damages arising out of an automobile accident; and (2) The question of whether the uninsured motorist coverages of several policies of insurance may be “stacked.”

All three insurance company appellants contest the finding of fault on the part of the uninsured motorist, and the resulting liability of them, and, with the exception of Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, contest the “stacking” of policies. The defendant Farmers Mutual Insurance Company of Nebraska did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lane v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pettid Ex Rel. Pettid v. EdwardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Protective Fire and Casualty Company v. WotenNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Swedberg v. Battle Creek Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Boren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. StamperWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Polenz v. FARM BUREAU INS. CO. OF NEB.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Viking Broadcasting Corp. v. Snell Publishing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API