Kirkman v. Kirkman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Although it has not been raised directly by either party, we first consider the issue of jurisdiction. “An actual controversy between the parties is a jurisdictional prerequisite for a proceeding under the Declaratory Judgment Act.” Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural and Economic Resources, 295 N.C. 683, 703, 249 S.E. 2d 402, 414 (1978). When the record shows that there is no basis for declaratory relief, as when the complaint does not allege an actual, genuine existing controversy, this may be taken advantage of by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. North Carolina…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Lide v. MearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- City of Raleigh v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Newman MacHine Company v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gaston Board of Realtors, Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Groves v. Community Housing Corp. of Haywood CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Carter v. Stanly CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- La Familia Cosmovision, Inc. v. the Inspiration NetworksNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
- North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.