Legal Opinion
Hills v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 16, 2022No. 3:17-cv-00556Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION KATIA HILLS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:17-CV-556 JD AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Katia Hills (“Hills”) has moved for summary judgment on her disparate treatment claim against Defendant AT&T Mobility Services LLC (“AT&T”). Hills claims that AT&T automatically excused certain categories of absences, such as disability accommodation, but did not automatically excuse pregnancy-related absences. (DE 140 at 2.) Hills asserts that this policy resulted in her being unable to obtain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goodman v. National Security Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Pram Nguyen v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.