Van Gordon, Etc. v. Portland Gen. Elec.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*742THORNTON, J.
Defendant Portland General Electric Company (PGE) appeals from a judgment entered after a jury verdict awarding plaintiff damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff at Austin Hot Springs. The issues are whether the trial court erred (1) in denying PGE’s motions to dismiss and for a directed verdict, (2) in instructing the jury and (3) in ruling on the evidence.
Austin Hot Springs is located in a forested area on the upper Clackamas River. PGE allows public recreational use of the area and provides picnic facilities, entrance roads and parking facilities. The characteristic which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Falls v. MortensenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Loney v. McPhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Hogg v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Lindner v. AhlgrenOregon Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hackett v. Alco Standard Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Van Gordon v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.