Legal Opinion

Brearley v. Schoening

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 8, 1926No. 25,544PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiff alleges that defendant contracted to sell and convey to him a house and lot in the city of Minneapolis and brings this action to enforce specific performance of the contract. He rests the claim that the contract had been entered into on the following two letters, the first written by defendant to plaintiff and the second written by plaintiff in answer thereto.

“Appleton, Minnesota,
“June 9th, 1923.
“Chas. S. Brearley, Esq.,
“Minneapolis, Minnesota.
“Dear Sir:
“I still have my house at 3537 17th Ave. South and will take $3,000 cash and this year’s taxes to be paid by purchaser if…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Langellier v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. Kileen v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Lewis v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Rahm v. CummingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Hamlin v. WistarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Podany v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Johnson v. M. J. O'neil, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Young v. St. Paul Publishers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Bey v. KeepingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API