Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Garrick

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 17, 1994No. 1930809PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Walter Garrick and his wife, Marie Garrick, petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to set aside its order requiring the Garricks to produce a copy of a statement given by Marie Garrick to her insurance company. The writ is granted.1

The rather meager record before us indicates that the Garricks' dog bit Henderson B. Young. Young sued the Garricks, seeking damages for negligence or wantonness in their handling of the dog. Young later filed a "Motion to Produce," seeking to compel the Garricks to produce "any statements" that Marie Garrick had given to anyone…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Ex Parte FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte Meadowbrook Ins. Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex Parte Water Works and Sewer Bd. of City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte CryerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API