Ex Parte Bozeman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This case involves the application of Rule 34, Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs, Bobby Ray Bozeman and Madge Bozeman, seek to discover certain documents in the possession of their insurer, defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm). The Honorable Newton B. Powell, Circuit Judge for Morgan County, denied plaintiff's motion for production. They filed a petition in this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the production of three disputed documents.
The issue presented by this petition is: Did Judge Powell abuse his discretion in denying plaintiffs' Rule 34…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Assured Inv'rs Life Ins. Co. v. Nat. U. Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Martin v. Loeb & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Feaster v. American Liberty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Folmar v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Ex Parte DavidsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte GarrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Ex Parte FullerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.