Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 3, 2000No. 1980982PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

761 So.2d 1000 (2000)

Ex parte STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.

(Re Billy Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company).

1980982.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 3, 2000.

T. Randall Lyons of Nix, Hotsford & Vercelli, P.C., Montgomery, for petitioner.

Kenneth J. Mendelsohn and Thomas E. James of Jemison & Mendelsohn, P.C., Montgomery, for respondent.

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is a defendant in an action filed in the Montgomery County Circuit Court by its insured Billy Smith. State Farm petitions for a writ of mandamus directing Judge…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Harper v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
  3. Janicker v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. Carver v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
  5. Ex Parte BozemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte Meadowbrook Ins. Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte CummingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Ex parte E.J.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Parker v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API