Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Anderson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1987No. 16733Published

1Opinion of the Court

748 P.2d 829 (1987)

113 Idaho 838

Art & Carol DANIELS, Plaintiffs-Respondents.

v.

Lyle R. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16733.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

November 25, 1987.

Petition for Review Denied February 10, 1988.

Kent E. Whittington, Idaho Falls, for defendant-appellant.

Art and Carol Daniels, pro se. No appearance on appeal.

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal arises from a dispute over a contract to perform a personal service. The trial judge determined that Lyle Anderson breached a contract with two homeowners, Art and Carol Daniels, by which Anderson agreed to install tile in their house. We are…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Angleton v. AngletonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cox v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Challis Irrigation Co. v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Simpson v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API