Legal Opinion
Jaeckel v. Jaeckel
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
This is a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment. The action is predicated on an agreement entered into by and between the parties in 1929, while they were still married and during the pendency of a divorce action commenced by the plaintiff wife. The agreement provided that the wife should be paid alimony of $700 per month and that, if the wife succeeded in her action, this amount should be incorporated in the final decree. The. agreement also provided, among other things, for a division of property between the husband and wife and for the husband to continue payment of premiums on a life…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Schmelzel v. SchmelzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Kunker v. KunkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Stewart v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Fales v. FalesNew York Supreme Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rainbow v. SwisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Connolly v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Hedaya v. HedayaNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Haboush v. HaboushCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.