Legal Opinion
Fales v. Fales
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLauer, J.
This is a motion by the defendant Ellen Dexter Fales for judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s amended complaint, striking out the plaintiff’s reply and the replies of the defendants DeCoursey Fales and Haliburton Fales, as trustees under the last will and testament of Haliburton Fales, Sr., and for judgment as asked in the counterclaim of the defendant Ellen Dexter Fales. The defendant DeCoursey Fales, as trustee under the last will and testament of Haliburton Fales, Sr., although a party hereto, has taken a disinterested position and is willing to be governed by *800this court’s determination of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Stewart v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- France v. FranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- McDonald v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoyt v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- Yates v. YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Graham v. HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Harges v. HargesNew York Supreme Court · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.