Legal Opinion
Hedaya v. Hedaya
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarmine A. Ventiera, J.
Upon the trial of this action for divorce, the plaintiff, having discontinued a second cause, proceeded on the ground of living apart for two years pursuant to a judgment of separation in her favor (Domestic Relations Law, § 170, subd. [5]). Satisfactory proof having been presented, judgment of divorce is granted to the plaintiff.
The complaint sets forth a third cause of action demanding the sum of $173.26 upon an unrepaid loan made to the defendant in October, 1962. A fourth cause of action demands the sum of $1,044.07 upon a loan made in December, 1962. The plaintiff’s testimony with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Wilson v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Fox v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Schmelzel v. SchmelzelNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kover v. KoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hall v. HallNew York City Family Court · 1975
- Sterlace v. SterlaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- People v. BruceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Stern v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.