Legal Opinion
State v. Bridges
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 20, 1986PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Justice.
Pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A (1980 & Supp.1985) and M.R.Crim.P. 37B, the State appeals from the Order of the Superi- or Court (Washington County) granting motions of the Defendants, Horace W. Moore and Edmund R. Bridges, to suppress certain evidence obtained as the result of an aerial surveillance and certain oral statements made by Defendant Bridges.
The appeal of these motions to suppress arises from a “buy-bust” undercover operation in the Machias area culminating in the seizure of approximately one hundred pounds of “sea hash” 1 on July 21, 1983. While Maine State…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Thomas Streifel, and Daniel J. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Cornelius Fullbright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CloutierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- State v. HerbestSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- State v. BridgesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- State v. CayerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.