Legal Opinion

Waterman v. Yamaha Motor Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to defendant, Yamaha Motor Corp. Plaintiff’s action was based upon the theory that an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) was negligently manufactured because it was equipped with a pull start rather than a locking ignition, thus making it more vulnerable to theft. Plaintiff was injured when she was struck by an ATV driven by a person who had stolen it from its owner.

*1030Defendant moved for summary judgment. In support of its motion, defendant submitted the affidavit of its Product Validation Specialist,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Vermette v. Kenworth Truck Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Honda Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Penn Iron & Metal Co. v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Ess v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Smith v. SfeirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API