Waterman v. Yamaha Motor Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to defendant, Yamaha Motor Corp. Plaintiff’s action was based upon the theory that an all-terrain vehicle (ATV) was negligently manufactured because it was equipped with a pull start rather than a locking ignition, thus making it more vulnerable to theft. Plaintiff was injured when she was struck by an ATV driven by a person who had stolen it from its owner.
*1030Defendant moved for summary judgment. In support of its motion, defendant submitted the affidavit of its Product Validation Specialist,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Vermette v. Kenworth Truck Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gardner v. Honda Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Penn Iron & Metal Co. v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Ess v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Smith v. SfeirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.